nairiporter (
nairiporter) wrote in
talkpolitics2025-11-05 10:30 pm
Entry tags:
On topic: Strongmen are the new chic
Lately I've found myself increasingly uneasy about how the appeal of strongman leadership is not just surviving but thriving, even in places where we once took democratic norms for granted. A recent article in The Economist reminds us that what once felt like an aberration is now looking more like a trend:
https://www.economist.com/culture/2025/10/30/strongmen-in-politics-and-technology-are-changing-the-world
In essence, the piece argues that the model of the bold, decisive leader who breaks through gridlock, fights the "elites" and projects strength is resonating in electorates weary of dysfunction and uncertainty. The fact that this is taking place not only in emerging democracies but among older ones suggests we're witnessing more than isolated cases, it may be a structural shift.
One contemporary example stands out: Leaders who position themselves as the antidote to bureaucratic inertia or corrupt elites tend to gain traction especially when institutions appear weak or compromised. That dynamic aligns with earlier scholarship showing that in weak states, strongmen win by promising "tough decisions" and then gradually hollowing out checks and balances:
https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-strongmen-win-in-weak-states/
( Read more... )
https://www.economist.com/culture/2025/10/30/strongmen-in-politics-and-technology-are-changing-the-world
In essence, the piece argues that the model of the bold, decisive leader who breaks through gridlock, fights the "elites" and projects strength is resonating in electorates weary of dysfunction and uncertainty. The fact that this is taking place not only in emerging democracies but among older ones suggests we're witnessing more than isolated cases, it may be a structural shift.
One contemporary example stands out: Leaders who position themselves as the antidote to bureaucratic inertia or corrupt elites tend to gain traction especially when institutions appear weak or compromised. That dynamic aligns with earlier scholarship showing that in weak states, strongmen win by promising "tough decisions" and then gradually hollowing out checks and balances:
https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-strongmen-win-in-weak-states/
( Read more... )
